Several case studies described media systems while presenting almost no media.
That is a credibility gap even when the words are true. A visitor reading about campaign production, content systems, application interfaces, or distribution should be able to see the relevant work in the page.
The case-study system now supports production images and campaign artwork alongside the written explanation. The visual belongs near the decision it supports: what was built, what the material looked like, and how the operating system was presented.
What the image proves—and what it does not
A campaign image proves that the creative artifact exists. It does not, by itself, prove that a post was published to every network, reached a particular audience, or produced a business result.
That distinction stays explicit. Published-post screenshots and platform receipts are a separate evidence class. They should be added when the live records are available, not approximated with artwork and captions.
The improvement is real but bounded: the case studies now show more of the actual work. The next evidence upgrade is to pair production assets with verified live-publication records where those records exist.