01
Security reporting
Vulnerability reports go directly to the people responsible for triage, containment, repair, and verified closure. The public disclosure process is available at /security.
Read the security process →Trust · BlackLabel Tech
The record behind the work.
This is the public starting point for how we approach security, delivery boundaries, release evidence, and a serious technical evaluation.
Public trust overview
Specific where public. Direct where confidential.
We do not publish security theatre. The material below states the practices we can describe publicly and the route for a scoped evaluation.
02
Data and deployment boundaries
Every engagement starts by identifying where data lives, which services are involved, and what remains under the customer’s control. Boundaries are recorded before delivery—not inferred after it.
03
Release and change practice
A release is not treated as complete because code exists. The relevant artifact, route, and intended behavior are checked through the delivery path before the work is called live.
04
Project Daybreak access
BlackLabel has vetted Project Daybreak access for scoped cybersecurity work. This is a capability signal, not a substitute for BlackLabel’s own controls, accountable ownership, or delivery evidence.
05
Security evaluation requests
For a current security questionnaire, deployment-boundary discussion, or delivery-practice review, contact the team with the scope of the proposed evaluation. Material is shared according to the engagement and applicable confidentiality terms.
Request an evaluation →Direct security contact